¶1(concurring in the result).
¶2I concur only to the extent that the main opinion grounds its harmless-error analysis in the testimony of the officer describing the contents of the envelope containing the controlled substance.
987 So. 2d 1122
Williams v. State
Decided November 16, 2007
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2011
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2007-11-16
View the full empirical analysis of this case →