987 So. 2d 237 - Holt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 660 So. 2d 1038 - State v. Hamilton · 359 So. 2d 557 - Moody v. State · Richardson v. State · Pender v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The forms of Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases appearing on the court’s website ... may be used by the trial judges of this state in charging the jury in every criminal case to the extent that the forms are applicable, unless the trial judge shall determine that an applicable form of instruction is erroneous or inadequate, in which event the judge shall modify or amend the form or give such other instruction as the trial judge shall determine to be necessary to instruct the jury accurately and sufficiently on the circumstances of the case; and, in such event, the trial judge shall state on the record or in a separate order the respect in which the judge finds the standard form erroneous or inadequate and the legal basis of the judge’s finding.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.