State v. Esquivel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The General Assembly did not mandate the exclusion of evidence in a criminal suit for a violation of [the strip search statute]. [A related statutory provision] provides that a person who suffers actual damages as a result of a violation of [the strip search statute] may initiate a private civil action to recover damages, but it does not mandate suppression of the evidence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 924 So. 2d 20 - Jenkins v. State

2. “Thus, any analysis of search and seizure questions under the Fourth Amendment is identical to search and seizure questions arising under Missouri law.” Id. (quoting State v. Damask, 936 S.W.2d 565, 570 (Mo. banc 1996)). 5 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Moore

3. “MO. CONST, art. I, § 15 (1945), provides the same guarantees against unreasonable search and seizures as the Fourth Amendment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Moore