Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

988 F.2d 1280

Docket No. 92-5213.

Gallagher v. E Catto US

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-02-01

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 1993

11 federal appellate ·

Relies on Kirchberg v. Feenstra · Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley · Walker v. Washington

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: D.C. Circuit Local Rule 11(c) states that unpublished orders, judgments, and explanatory memoranda may not be cited as precedents, but counsel may refer to unpublished dispositions when the binding or preclusive effect of the disposition, rather than its quality as precedent, is relevant.

778 F.Supp. 570

AFFIRMED.

Before MIKVA, Chief Judge, and STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS and SENTELLE, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Upon consideration of the motion for summary affirmance, the opposition thereto and the reply, it is

¶2

ORDERED that the motion be granted substantially for the reasons stated by the district court in its opinion filed December 9, 1991. The merits of the parties' positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).

¶3

The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir. Rule 15.

/988/f2d/1280 · .json · Public domain