Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 F.2d 1364 - Lowery v. Collins

Lowery v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

988 F.2d 1364 · 1993

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
5
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably State v. Snowden (2005), Thomas v. United States (2006)

26 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions

240199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Franks v. Delaware · Pointer v. Texas · California v. Green · Idaho v. Wright

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “on the evidence that violated [Jones's] confrontation right, not the sufficiency of the evidence remaining after excision of the tainted evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “no reasonable possibility that the tainted evidence might have contributed to the jury's verdict of guilty.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a defendant convicted on the basis of constitutionally inadmissible evidence is entitled to a new trial unless the error 'was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt'--i.e., that there [wa]s [no] reasonable possibility that the evidence complained of might have contributed to the conviction”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.