Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 FSUPP2D 772 - Pro Tanks Leasing v. Midwest Propane & Refined Fuels, LLC

Pro Tanks Leasing v. Midwest Propane & Refined Fuels, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Bestfoods · Cannon Mfg Co v. Cudahy Packing Co · Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Brown · Dole Food Co. v. Patrickson · Anderson v. Abbott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) inadequate capitalization; (2) failure to issue stock; (3) failure to observe corporate formalities; (4) nonpayment of dividends; (5) insolvency of the debtor corporation; (6) nonfunctioning of the other officers or directors; (7) absence of corporate records; (8) commingling of funds; (9) diversion of assets from the corporation by or to a stockholder or other person or entity to the detriment of creditors; (10) failure to maintain arm's-length relationships among related entities; and (11) whether, in fact, the corporation is a mere façade for the operation of the dominant stockholders.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) domination of the corporation resulting in a loss of corporate separateness and (2) circumstances under which continued recognition of the corporation would sanction fraud or promote injustice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The burden of proof to demonstrate grounds for piercing the corporate veil is on the party seeking to impose liability on the parent corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.