Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 P2D 657 - People v. Covington

People v. Covington’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2021

7 state decisions

401999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado v. Vincent Joseph SPOTO · 30 Colo. App. 357 - Stauffer v. Karabin · People v. Deadmond · People v. Marquez · Romero v. People

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “and the trial court 's refusal to deliver it appropriate.4 Id. ¶28 After the court of appeals decided Sanchez but before the court decided Covington, the General Assembly amended the definition of serious bodily injury. We now review that amendment . D. The General Assembly's Amendment of the Serious Bodily Injury Definition ¶29 After Stroup , the General Assembly amended the definition of serious bodily injury to add a clarifying interjection, leaving the original phrasing otherwise unchanged. When this court decided Stroup ,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] physician, surgeon, or registered professional ... shall not be examined without the consent of his patient as to any information acquired in attending the patient which was necessary to enable him to prescribe or act for the patient.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “encouragle]l patients to fully disclose medically relevant information to their physicians by reducing the possibility of humiliation or embarrassment through subsequent public disclosure of such information by the physician.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.