Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 P.2d 949 - State v. Kihlstrom

State v. Kihlstrom’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
February 2018
most recently cited

17 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Albrecht v. State · State v. Carter · State v. James · State v. Dibello · Harline v. Barker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a person who merely utters a forged instrument can be inferred to have had knowledge of the forgery,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “knowledge that he is facilitating a fraud.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'upon reviewing the evidence and all inferences that can be reasonably drawn from it, ... some evidence exists from which a reasonable jury could find that the elements of the crime had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.