Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 So. 2d 103 - Hampton v. State

988 So. 2d 103 - Hampton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. JUDGES, ETC. · Molina v. State · Samson v. State · Corbitt v. State · 548 So. 2d 765 - White v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Where, as here, a court has orally found a defendant competent but erroneously failed to enter the required written order, we have affirmed with directions to enter the order nunc pro tunc.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “If the court finds the defendant competent to proceed, the court shall enter its order so finding and shall proceed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “we must note our disapproval of the trial judge's 'Response to Mandate,' which we strike as unauthorized”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.