Robinson v. Weiland’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 443 So. 2d 944 - Mercer v. Raine · 706 So. 2d 43 - Cox v. Burke · BLACKHAWK HEAT. & P. CO., INC. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp. · 863 So. 2d 231 - The Florida Bar v. Miller · 839 So. 2d 910 - Akins v. Akins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Fraud on the court occurs where “it can be demonstrated, clearly and convincingly, that a party has sentiently set in motion some unconscionable scheme calculated to interfere with the judicial system’s ability impartially to adjudicate a matter by improperly influencing the trier of fact or unfairly hampering the presentation of the opposing party’s claim or defense.” Cox v. Burke, 706 So.2d 43, 46 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.