Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

988 So. 2d 1192

Dueno v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 12, 2008

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2008-08-12

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2017

7 state decisions

Relies on Anders v. California

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2008-08-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant filed an appeal under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because our independent review of the record did not reveal reversible error, we affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence, but we remand for correction of a scrivener’s error contained in the written judgment. Although the written judgment reflects that appellant was convicted of a life felony, the offense is a first-degree felony. The trial court is directed to correct the judgment accordingly.

¶2AFFIRMED but REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

KAHN, LEWIS, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
/988/so2d/1192 · .json · Public domain