Forrest v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited
29 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Spera v. State · 944 So. 2d 208 - State v. Green · State v. Oakley · 973 So. 2d 547 - Pierre v. State · 818 So. 2d 485 - State v. Seraphin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he defendant must state in the rule 3.850 motion how he or she will prove that the immigration warning was not given. In the normal case, this will require the defendant to allege that a hearing transcript will demonstrate a violation of rule 3.172(c)(8). Absent conclusive evidence of a violation, the trial court has discretion to deny relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he burden is on the movant to establish that the plea in the case under attack is the only basis for deportation. Only then can the movant show prejudice resulting from the failure to advise of deportation consequences in the case under attack.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“evidence regarding whether the plea in this case alone subjects the movant to deportation”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.