988 So. 2d 644 - Marshall v. Marshall’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 554 So. 2d 499 - Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais · Execu-Tech Bus. Sys., Inc. v. New Oji Paper Co. Ltd. · 513 So. 2d 674 - Unger v. PUBLISHER ENTRY SERVICE · Wade v. Wade · Smith v. Croom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under the divisible divorce concept, if the trial court has subject matter jurisdiction over a marriage, pursuant to sections 61.021 and 61.052, Florida Statutes, then it can dissolve the marital relationship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.