988 So. 2d 654 - Kohl v. BCBSF’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 377 So. 2d 1150 - Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee · 471 So. 2d 4 - Pan-Am Tobacco v. Department of Corrections · Travertine Corp. v. Lexington-Silverwood · 867 So. 2d 1184 - MEBA Medical & Benefits Plan v. Lago · 801 So. 2d 259 - Taylor v. City of Riviera Beach
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In assessing the adequacy of the pleading of a claim, the court must accept the facts alleged therein as true and all inferences that reasonably can be drawn from those facts must be drawn in favor of the pleader. In order to state a cause of action, a complaint must allege sufficient ultimate facts to show that the pleader is entitled to relief. A court may not go beyond the four corners of the complaint and exhibits attached thereto.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.