Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 988 SW2D 556 - Rice v. State

Rice v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
February 2012
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2012

18 state decisions

100199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Sanders v. State · Day v. State · State v. Roll · Yoakum v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Movant’s guilty plea was entered in an unknowing, involuntary and unintelligent manner because she was denied her right to effective assistance of counsel ... when her attorney failed to exercise the customary skill and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would under the same or similar circumstances and as a result thereof, movant was prejudiced. Specifically, counsel was ineffective for the following reasons: Movant’s guilty plea was involuntary, unknowing, and unintelligent because plea counsel, Mary Dilks, unreasonably failed to ensure that the full terms of the plea agreement were on the record during the guilty plea proceeding and specifically that the two sentences were to run concurrently. Alternatively, counsel unreasonably failed to advise movant that the terms of the plea agreement no longer called for concurrent sentences and that there was a possibility of consecutive sentences.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.