Cafe Inc v. St Johns County’s Empirical Analysis
989 F.2d 1136 · 1993
Citation profile
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Mitsubishi International Corporation v. Cardinal Textile Sales Inc (1994), Schiavo Schindler v. Schiavo W
14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. · United States v. Jefferson County · United States v. Lambert · Lucero v. Operation Rescue of Birmingham
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[n]o attention is paid to the merits of the controversy beyond that necessary to determine the presence or absence of an abuse of discretion.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits; (2) an irreparable injury if the injunction does not issue; (3) a threatened injury to [the movant] that is greater than any damage the preliminary injunction would cause the [opposing party]; and (4) the absence of any adverse effect on the public interest in the injunction issues. Cafe 207, Inc. v. St. Johns County, 989 F.2d 1136, 1137 (11th Cir.1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Revette v. Int'l Ass'n of Bridge Works, 740 F.2d 892 , 893 (11th Cir.1984) (citation omitted). As we review the denial of the preliminary injunction,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.