Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 F.2d 229 - Olson v. United States

Olson v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

989 F.2d 229 · 1993

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2015 · most notably Carriger v. Stewart (1997), United States v. Griffin (1996)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

170199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Missouri v. Continential Insurance Cos. · Brown III v. Felsen · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Goldstein v. Garrity · Nebraska v. Wyoming

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “overburden [the] judicial system [by addressing] another needlessly repetitious and wasteful collateral attack. Some place, somewhere, somehow, we must put an end to this repetitious and meritless litigation if we are to be able to attempt to render justice in a timely fashion to those with meritorious claims.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that the recantation is true; that the jury might have reached a different result if the witness in question had testified truthfully; and that the witness's false testimony took the defendant by surprise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.