Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 F.2d 261 - United States v. Stowe

United States v. Stowe’s Empirical Analysis

989 F.2d 261 · 1993

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
December 2014
most recently cited

38 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2014 · most notably United States v. Kozinski (1994), United States v. McDonald (1993)

38 federal appellate · 1 district ·

380199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Guerrero · United States v. Thomas · United States v. Gant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Discharge and dismissal upon a successful conclusion of a disposition of supervision shall be deemed without adjudication of guilt and shall not be termed a conviction for purposes of disqualification or disabilities imposed by law upon conviction of a crime. Two years after the discharge and dismissal ... a person may have his record of arrest sealed or expunged as may be provided by law.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Sentences for expunged convictions are not counted....”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “A number of jurisdictions have various procedures pursuant to which previous convictions may be set aside or the defendant may be pardoned for reasons unrelated to innocence or errors of law, e.g., in order to restore civil rights or to remove the stigma associated with a criminal conviction. Sentences resulting from such convictions are to be counted. However, expunged convictions are not counted. § 4A1.2(j).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.