Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 F.2d 366 - United States v. Mendonsa

United States v. Mendonsa’s Empirical Analysis

989 F.2d 366 · 1993

Citation profile

121
cited by 121 later decisions
10
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

67 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 121 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Sira v. Morton (2004), United States v. Allen (2000)

67 federal appellate · 2 district · 12 state decisions — followed in 10 states

760199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Vandygriff v. Phillips · Hannahville Indian Community v. United States · United States v. McConney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 121 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A magistrate judge may issue a search warrant if, under the totality of the circumstances, there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular location.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[M]ere confirmation of innocent static details is insufficient to support an anonymous tip.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a]n anonymous tip, without more, does not constitute probable cause.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.