Serine v. Peterson’s Empirical Analysis
989 F.2d 371 · 1993
Citation profile
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Khan v. Attorney General of United States (2012), Clausen v. Sea-3, Inc. (1994)
24 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Firstier Mortgage Co. v. Investors Mortgage Insurance · Anderson v. Allstate Insurance · Ruby v. Secretary of the United States Navy · Alaniz v. California Processors, Inc. · Firchau v. Diamond National Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a notice of appeal from a non-final decision operate[s] as a notice of appeal from the final judgment only when a district court announces a decision that would be appealable if immediately followed by the entry of judgment”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“Plaintiff himself betrayed his awareness of this fact by filing objections to the magistrate judge's order in the district court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“In certain circumstances, this court has considered the prematurity of a notice of appeal to be cured by the subsequent entry of judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Echevarria v. Gomez
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.