Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

989 F.2d 493

Docket No. 92-8098.

In Re: E. L. Mason

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 2, 1993 Decided: March 17, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-03-17

Relies on In re United Steelworkers of America · In re Beard · Louise Landry v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-03-17

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

E. L. Mason, Petitioner Pro Se.

PETITION DENIED.

Before HALL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

¶1

E. L. Mason petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to transfer the underlying matter to the Middle District of North Carolina, to disqualify the district judge, and to enter a final default judgment in the underlying matter. We deny the petition.

¶2

Mason has made no showing of extrajudicial bias, and neither transfer of the case nor disqualification of the judge is warranted. See In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826-27 (4th Cir. 1987). Further, the district court treated the case, which was dismissed with prejudice on October 28, 1992, in an expeditious and timely fashion. Finally, as the mandamus petition was filed prior to a final judgment, and, in any event, as mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, see In re United Steelworkers, 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979), the underlying judgment is not before us.

¶3

We note that Mason moved for expedited consideration of this petition. Accordingly, we have vacated our earlier order consolidating this petition with two of Mason's other appeals; we have considered this petition as expeditiously as possible given the Court's current case load.

¶4

Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

/989/f2d/493 · .json · Public domain