Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

989 F.2d 493

Docket No. 93-6058.

Irby v. Taylor J

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: March 1, 1993 Decided: March 25, 1993

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1993-03-25

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Louise Landry v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1993-03-25

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-92-3145)

Roy James Irby, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Cathleen C. Brockmeyer, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

¶1

Roy James Irby, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Irby v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3145 (D. Md. Jan. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/989/f2d/493 · .json · Public domain