Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 F.2d 572 - Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft MBH & Co. v. Navimpex Centrala Navala

Seetransport Wiking Trader Schiffarhtsgesellschaft MBH & Co. v. Navimpex Centrala Navala’s Empirical Analysis

989 F.2d 572 · 1993

Citation profile

96
cited by 96 later decisions
1
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 96 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Robinson v. Overseas Military Sales Corp. (1994), Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany (1994)

28 federal appellate · 12 district · 1 state decisions

3801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rosado v. Wyman · Verlinden B. v. v. Central Bank of Nigeria · Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria · Lincoln Bank v. Goggin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 96 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'Prior to trial, [ ] when a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction is decided on the basis of affidavits and other written materials, the plaintiff need only make a prima facie showing.'”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “when a country becomes a signatory to the Convention, by the very provisions of the Convention, the signatory state must have contemplated enforcement actions in other signatory states.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards made in the territory of a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.