Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 F.2d 733 - In Re Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., and Burzynski Research Institute Inc.

In Re Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., and Burzynski Research Institute Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
April 2024
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Crowe v. Henry (1995), Dale Brown

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

2901993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Hj Inc v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company · Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Independent Federation of Flight Attendants · Air Line Pilots Ass'n v. Landry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) a person who has received income from a pattern of racketeering activity cannot invest that income in an enterprise; (b) a person cannot acquire or maintain an interest in an enterprise through a pattern of racketeering; (c) a person who is employed by or associated with an enterprise cannot conduct the enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering; (d) a person cannot conspire to violate subsections (a), (b), or (e).”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) a person who engages in (2) a pattern of racketeering activity, (3) connected to the acquisition, establishment, conduct, or control of an enterprise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a scheme to defraud by means of false or fraudulent representation”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.