Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2015
4 federal appellate · 3 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 7 Conn. App. 164 - Genco v. Connecticut Light & Power Co. · Moss v. Dept. of Natural Resources · 226 Ill. App. 3d 440 - Anderson v. Boy Scouts of America, Inc. · Garreans Ex Rel. Garreans v. City of Omaha · Hegg v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[c]onsideration [under the Act] should not be deemed given unless it is a charge necessary to utilize the overall benefits of a recreational area so that it may be regarded as an entrance or admission fee.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the admission price or fee asked by an oimer of land or an invitation or permission without price or fee to use land for recreational purposes when such invitation or permission is given for the purpose of sales promotion, advertising or public goodwill in fostering business purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The interpretation of the various recreational use statutes is controlled by the precise language of each statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.