Doe v. Berkeley County School District’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 20 U.S.C. § 1687 (§ 908 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 20 U.S.C. § 8801
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · United States v. Diebold, Inc. · Cannon v. University of Chicago · Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public Schools · Charbonnages De France v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Citadel“Title IX prohibits discrimination occurring under any educational program or activity.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Doe v. Citadel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.