Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 FSUPP2D 1027 - Cabasug v. Crane Co.

Cabasug v. Crane Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc. · Curtiss-Wright Corporation v. General Electric Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a system of law coextensive with, and operating uniformly in, the whole country. It certainly could not have been the intention to place the rules and limits of maritime law under the disposal and regulation of the several States, as that would have defeated the uniformity and consistency at which the Constitution aimed on all subjects of a commercial character affecting the intercourse of the States with each other or with foreign states.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[Ejvidence that [the plaintiff] was exposed to asbestos from a particular Defendant’s product, combined with expert testimony that such exposure is sufficient to contribute to asbestos-related diseases, is sufficient to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the product was a substantial factor in causing [the plaintiffs] injuries.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos-containing replacement parts that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.