State v. Shepherd’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently September 2018 · most notably United States v. Walker (2007), State v. Andresen (2001)
2 federal appellate · 23 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TB · International Ass'n of Machinists v. Duckworth · Securities & Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co. · United States v. Crosby
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in a light most favorable to the verdict. We recite the facts accordingly.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“State v. Shepherd, 1999 UT App 305, ¶ 10 , 989 P.2d 503 ; see also State v. Krueger, 1999 UT App 054, ¶ 23 , 975 P.2d 489 , cert. granted, 984 P.2d 1023 (Utah 1999) (noting adequate notice of prohibited conduct even when statute failed to define term”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“brief fails to cite relevant legal authority or provide any meaningful analysis regarding [an] issue,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.