Washington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently October 2022 · most notably John Joseph Romano v. Gary Gibson Warden of the Oklahoma State Penitentiary (2001), 2006 OK CR 19 - Hogan v. State (2006)
10 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wainwright v. Sykes · Jackson v. Denno · Witherspoon v. Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the sufficiency of the evidence of an aggravating circumstance is challenged on appeal, this Court reviews the evidence in the light most favorable to the State to determine if any rational trier of fact could have found the aggravating circumstance beyond a reasonable doubt.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State · Black v. State“Reid admitted that different people exhibit different signs of shock and that he did not know what signs Appellant exhibited immediately after the shooting because he did not see Appellant until three hours later. Assuming arguendo Detective Reid's opinion was inadmissible, any error was cured by his testimony explaining Appellant's demeanor as compared to other individuals Reid perceived as exhibiting signs of shock. Accordingly, we find Appellant was not prejudiced by the admission of Reid's opinion. ¶ 23 Lastly, Appellant argues he was prejudiced by Sgt. Jestice's opinion that the victim”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It is your responsibility as jurors to determine the facts from the evidence, to follow the rules of law as stated in these instructions, to reach a fair and impartial verdict of guilty or not guilty based upon the evidence, [and to determine punishment if you should find the defendant guilty,] as you have sworn you would do. You must not use any method of chance in arriving at a verdict, but must base your verdict on the judgment of each juror.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Myers v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.