Borel v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
72
cited by 72 later decisions
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
1 district · 70 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · State v. Williams · Brown v. Texas-LA Cartage, Inc. · 595 So. 2d 624 - Lima v. Schmidt · 370 So. 2d 521 - Lott v. Haley
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o action for damages for injury or death against any physician ... arising out of patient care shall be brought unless filed within one year from the date of the alleged act, omission, or neglect, or within one year from the date of discovery[.]”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“... The filing of a request for review of a claim shall suspend the running of prescription against all joint and solidary obligors, and all joint tortfeasors, including but not limited to health care providers, both qualified and not qualified, to the same extent that prescription is suspended against the party or parties that are the subject of the request for review... (emphasis added)”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“... the more specific provisions of the Medical Malpractice Act regarding suspension of prescription against joint tortfeasors apply to the exclusion of the general code article on interruption of prescription against joint tortfeasors, LSA-C.C. art. 2324(C).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.