Michel v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 807 So. 2d 55 - Bruno v. State · 784 So. 2d 418 - Gore v. State · 966 So. 2d 493 - Aversano v. State · 937 So. 2d 180 - Gregory v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the evidence presented at trial for battery does not establish, as a matter of law, whether the force used by the defendant was deadly or non-deadly, the question is a factual one to be decided by the jury, and the defendant is entitled to jury instructions on the justifiable use of bbth types of force.” Id. at 681 . . It is surely frustrating, for both trial courts and appellate judges, that the standard jury instructions relating to self-defense have so many potential pitfalls.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jackson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.