Revell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 733 So. 2d 963 - Cottle v. State · 608 So. 2d 111 - Young v. State · Lewis v. State · Kleppinger v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We conclude that Lewis is entitled to relief because his trial counsel conceded that when the state's offer of one year was made, he failed to inform Lewis of a potential sentence of 30 years incarceration and consistently informed him, instead, that his maximum exposure of incarceration was two to three years. Even though the possibility of a much longer sentence seemed remote, the possibility became the reality. Lewis, in order to make an informed decision, needed to be aware of the possible penalties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lester v. State“for failing to advise him of the possibility and consequences of being sentenced as a habitual felony offender.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lester v. State“good faith resumption of plea negotiations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lester v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.