Cory v. Cory’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 549 So. 2d 840 - Rosell v. Esco · 907 So. 2d 37 - Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Government · 430 So. 2d 1303 - State v. Marchese · 700 So. 2d 533 - Havener v. Havener · LeJeune v. Riviana Foods
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An appellate court, as a matter of judicial economy, has a right to consider the possibility of mootness on its own motion and to dismiss the appeal if the matter has in fact become moot. A moot case is one which seeks a judgment or decree which, when rendered, can give no practical relief. It is well settled that an appellate court will not render advisory opinions from which no practical results can follow. As a result, courts have established the rule that moot questions will not be considered on appeal. In cases of injunctive relief, it is clear that when the activity which a plaintiff seeks to enjoin has already occurred during the pendency of the suit, the matter is moot and the propriety of the trial court's action in denying or granting the injunction will not be considered by the reviewing court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Voluntary underemployment is a question of good faith of the obligor spouse.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.