Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 SW2D 192 - Roberson v. State

Roberson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Gilpin · 234 Mo. App. 1012 - Crevisour v. Hendrix · State v. Becker · State v. Roberson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Appellate review of a Rule 29.15 motion is limited to a determination of whether the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). “Findings and conclusions are deemed clearly erroneous only if, after reviewing the entire record, we are left with the definite and firm impression that a mistake has been made.” State v. Gilpin, 954 S.W.2d 570, 575 (Mo.App.1997).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.