Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 989 S.W.2d 365 - Forest v. State

Forest v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on National Educational Support Systems, Inc. v. Autoskill, Inc. · Royster v. State · Rousseau v. State · Bignall v. State · Manning v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1) Can circumstantial evidence that is subject to two interpretations be "affirmative evidence” of only one of them, thus entitling a defendant to an instruction on a lesser-included offense? 2) Is the failure to instruct the jury on a lesser-included offense actually harmful when the jury "passed” on the lesser-included offenses that were submitted and there is no evidence of jury confusion or misconduct?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “intends to cause serious bodily injury and commits an act clearly dangerous to human life that causes the death of an individual.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.