Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 A.D.2d 692

In re Ariola

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1984-02-02

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently September 1993

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-02-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Application for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law in the State of New York granted only to the extent of referring this matter to the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department to hear and report, and pending receipt of said report, the application is held in abeyance. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Ross, Bloom and Alexander, JJ.

/99/ad2d/692 · .json · Public domain