¶1The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant’s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Richter, AbdusSalaam and Román, JJ.
99 A.D.3d 490
People v. Perkins
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 9, 2012
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 2012-10-09
Decided 2012-10-09