State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1984 · most notably State v. Yslas (1984), State v. Kevil (1974)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 54 Cal. 2d 621 - People v. Gould · State v. Evans · State v. Eisenstein · 38 Wash. 2d 593 - State v. Wilson · State v. Maxwell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The law is well settled that one who does not object to claimed hearsay testimony at the time it is offered thereby waives any objection on appeal. * * * ””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lerma · State v. Dillon““ ‘Evidence of an extra-judicial identification is admissible, not only to corrobrate an identification made at the trial * * * but as independent evidence of identity. * * * [E]vidence of an extra-judicial identification is admitted regardless of whether the testimonial identification is impeached, because the earlier identification has greater probative value than an identification made in the courtroom after the suggestions of others and the circumstances of the trial may have intervened to create a fancied recognition in the witness’ mind. * * * [T]he principal danger of admitting hearsay evidence is not present since the witness is available at the trial for cross-examination.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.