Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 ARK 193 - Tedstrom v. Puddephatt

Tedstrom v. Puddephatt’s Empirical Analysis

1911

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
7
states following
February 1975
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 1975

2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions

701911192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Young v. Berman · Berman v. Shelby · McAdams v. State · Smith v. McLean · Harris Lumber Co. v. Wheeler Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A provision of the lease for a termination of the tenancy or of liability for rent upon the destruction of the building, or in case it be destroyed without any reference to injury, has been decided not to apply when there is no actual destruction, but merely injuries to parts of the building by fire or other casualty, temporarily unfitting such parts for occupancy.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““That there would have to be such a destruction of the building by fire or other casualty as would permanently unfit the premises for occupancy. If the inability to occupy the premises was only partial or temporary by reason of the fire, then there was not such a destruction of the building ... as would cause a forfeiture of the lease or a cessation of the rent.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.