In Re Murphy’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2012
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Philpott v. Essex County Welfare Board · Porter v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. · Lawrence v. Shaw · Daugherty v. Central Trust Co. · 445 F. Supp. 749 - Hoffman v. Searles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a program that provides financial assistance and general assistance, medical assistance to persons who are ineligible for public assistance programs that are supported in whole or in part by federal funds and who meet the eligibility requirements for general assistance set forth in rules adopted by the Department of Human Service under § 5113.06 of the Revised Code.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Kurilich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.