Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 CAL 386 - McDonald v. Conniff

McDonald v. Conniff’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
July 1997
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently July 1997 · most notably 51 Cal. 2d 177 - In Re Petersen (1958), The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. Kerrigan (1906)

32 state decisions

12018931900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation District · City of Pasadena v. Stimson · In re the New York Elevated Railroad · Ferguson v. . Ross · In the Matter of the Application of Church

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not necessary that a law shall affect all people of the state in order that it may ho general, or that a statute concerning procedure shall be applies We to every action that may be brought in the courts of the state. A staute which affects all the individuals of a class is a general law, while one which relates to particular persons or things of a class is special. A statute regelating the rights of married women, or which affects all mining corporations, or confers rights upon municipal corporations of a certain class, or places restrictions upon all foreign corporations, is a general law. City of Pasadena v. Stimson, 91 Cal. 238 , 27 Pac. 604 ; In re Madera Irr. Dist., 92 Cal. 316 , 28 Pac. 272 , 675; Wheeler v. Philadelphia, 77 Pa. St. 348 ; Land Co. v. Soper, 39 Iowa, 112 ; In re New York El. R. Co., 70 N. Y. 350 ; In re Church, 92 N. Y. 1 ; Ferguson v. Ross, 126 N. Y. 459 , 27 N. E. 954 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.