Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 Cal. App. 671 - Lauritsen v. Goldsmith

99 Cal. App. 671 - Lauritsen v. Goldsmith’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
April 1968
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 1968 · most notably 37 Cal. 2d 356 - Malloy v. Fong (1951), 12 Cal. 2d 334 - Long v. Rumsey (1938)

26 state decisions

14019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Zellner v. Wassman · 46 Cal. App. 178 - Mayborne v. Citizens Trust & Savings Bank · Etchas v. Orena · Hagan v. McNary · 69 Cal. App. 291 - Warder v. Hutchison

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is also contended by respondents that a cause of action upon quantum meruit would be barred by the statute of limitations with the exception of that part of the claim which arose during the last two years preceding the death of decedent. It has been held, however, under facts similar to those in this case that the law not only implies a promise to pay but implies the promise to pay at the termination of the services, so that the cause of action does not arise until the day of the death of decedent and the statute of limitations does not bar any part of the period of continuous services. (Hagan v. McNary, 170 Cal. 141 [L. R. A. 1915E, 562, 148 Pac. 937] ; Mayborne v. Citizens T. & S. Bank, supra; Warder v. Hutchinson, [ 69 Cal. App. 291 ( 231 Pac. 563 )], supra.) ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.