Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 CALAPP2D 137 - Bardin v. Case

Bardin v. Case’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
1
states following
May 1977
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently May 1977 · most notably 19 Cal. 3d 530 - Hasson v. Ford Motor Co. (1977), 3 Cal. 3d 756 - Haft v. Lone Palm Hotel (1970)

26 state decisions

200195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 20 Cal. 2d 457 - Blank v. Coffin · Anthony v. Hobbie · De La Cuesta v. Calkins · 21 Cal. 2d 773 - Ferroni v. Pacific Finance Corp. · Bunch v. Kin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"The 'circumstances, including the physical evidence,’ warrant only one conclusion—that without warning, the Loyd car shot across the road directly into the path of plaintiffs’ car, and that plaintiff Mr. Bardin had perhaps a second, at the most, in which to react. Plaintiff driver was not required to anticipate negligence on the part of the other driver [citing Bingham v. Greenamyer, 25 Cal.App.2d 467 ( 77 P.2d 867 )], nor may he be held guilty of contributory negligence because in a moment of imminent peril he failed to take the course that careful consideration after the fact shows that he ought to have taken [citation].” See also Flannery v. Koch, 103 Cal. App.2d 55, 59 [ 228 P.2d 580 ]. The nonsuit as to respondents Marjorie and Martin L. Brinson was properly granted.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.