Ward v. Congress Const. Co.’s Empirical Analysis
99 F. 598 · 1900
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently February 2011
5 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kohl v. United States · Tennessee v. Davis · Dickerson v. Colgrove · Stanley v. Schwalby · Railway Company v. Whitton's Administrator
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““That final judgments in any Circuit Court of the United States for the enforcement of the revenue laws of the United States, and for the collection of the. duties on merchandise imported therein, may be examined" and reversed or affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States, without regard to the sum or value in controversy in such action, a't the instance of eitheFparty.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In its essence, the proceeding was a new suit or new application for an injunction against a new party.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.