Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 F.2d 396 - Reed v. Colpoys

Reed v. Colpoys’s Empirical Analysis

99 F.2d 396 · 1938

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
5
states following
July 1976
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently July 1976 · most notably Self v. People (1956), Fowler v. Ross (1952)

16 federal appellate · 11 state decisions

11019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 662

Relies on Roberts v. Reilly · Arthur Appleyard v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Reggel · Drinkall v. Spiegel · McClarran v. Longdin-Brugger Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever the executive authority of any State or Territory demands any person as a fugitive from justice, of the executive authority or any State or Territory to which such person has fled, and produces a copy of an indictment found or an affidavit made before a magistrate of any State or Territory, charging the person demanded with having committed treason, felony, or other crime, certified as authentic by the governor or chief magistrate of the State or Territory from which the person so charged has fled, it shall be the duty of the executive authority of the State or Territory to which such person has fled to cause him to be arrested and secured, and to cause notice of the arrest to be given to the executive authority making such demand, or to the agent or such authority appointed to receive the fugitive, and to cause the fugitive to be delivered to such agent when he shall appear. . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A person charged in any State with Treason, Felony, or other Crime, who shall flee from Justice, and be found in another State, shall, on Demand of the executive Authority of the State from which he fled, be delivered up to be removed to the State having Jurisdiction of the Crime.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.