Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

99 F.2d 69

Docket Nos. 1666, 1667, 1673, 1701-1703.

Hudspeth v. Dvork

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Sept. 22, 1938

Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1938-09-22

Relies on Aderhold v. Ashlock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Orie Leon Phillips · Decided 1938-09-22

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 1979

6 federal appellate ·

5019381940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1„ „ T , Before PHILLIPS, BRATTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

¶2T^TTTT T TT^r, .. T j PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

¶3These cases present the identical question decided in Aderhold, Warden, v. Ash-lock, 10 Cir., 99 F.2d 67, decided September 22, 1938, and on authority thereof, the several judgments appealed from are reversed and the causes remanded with instructions to vacate the several judgments directing the discharge of the appellees, to enter orders that appellees be redelivei ed to the custody of the Warden, and to issue and execute such writs or processes as may be necessary to make such orders effective.

¶4Reversed.

/99/f2d/69 · .json · Public domain