Marques v. Fitzgerald’s Empirical Analysis
99 F.3d 1 · 1996
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently August 2022
2 federal appellate · 14 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Fashion House, Inc. v. K Mart Corp. · Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto Rico · Borden v. Paul Revere Life Insurance · 64 Md. App. 1 - Moniodis v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i) A state officer, employee, agency, department, division, bureau, board, commission, council, authority, or other body in the executive branch of state government. (ii) An agency, board, commission, council, member, or employee of the legislative branch of state government. (iii) A county, city, town, or regional governing body, a council, school district, or a board, department, commission, agency, or any member or employee of the entity. (iv) Any other body which is created by state or local authority or which is primarily funded by or through state or local authority, or any member or employee of that body. (v) A law enforcement agency or any member or employee of a law enforcement agency. (vi) The judiciary and any member or employee of the judiciary. (vii) Any federal agency.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[bjecause the employee ... reports or is about to report to a public body, verbally or in writing, a violation which the employee knows or reasonably believes has occurred or is about to occur, of a law or regulation or rule promulgated under the law of ... the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In - 26 - assessing whether conduct is extreme and outrageous, Rhode Island courts have used three factors: 1) the conduct itself; 2) the particular relationship of the parties; and 3) the known or knowable susceptibility of the plaintiff to the emotional injury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.