Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 F.3d 1056 - Vining v. Runyon

Vining v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis

99 F.3d 1056 · 1996

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently January 2016

3 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions

50199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · Arizona v. San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona · Reagan v. Abourezk · Abourezk v. Reagan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when the submissions involve compelling national security concerns or the statute granting the cause of action specifically provides for in camera resolution of the dispute.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.