Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 99 F.3d 1086 - Jackson v. Chater

Jackson v. Chater’s Empirical Analysis

99 F.3d 1086 · 1996

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
July 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Moore v. Barnhart (2005), Andrews v. Lakeshore Rehabilitation Hospital (1998)

20 federal appellate · 2 district ·

310199620002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Shalala v. Schaefer · Melkonyan v. Sullivan · Sullivan v. Finkelstein · 115 S. Ct. 89 - Green v. United States · Faucher v. Secretary of Health & Human Services

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The court ... may at any time order additional evidence to be taken before the Commissioner of Social Security, but only upon a showing that there is new evidence which is material and that there is good cause for the failure to incorporate such evidence into the record in a prior proceeding;”
    16 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “) pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[A] sentence-four remand is based upon a determination that the Commissioner erred in some respect in reaching the decision to deny benefits.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.