99 F3d 1130 Marks v. C Duncil

99 F.3d 1130

Robert S. MARKS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William C. DUNCIL, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 96-6423.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 3, 1996.
Decided Oct. 10, 1996.

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District Judge. (CA-95-304-3)

Robert S. Marks, Appellant Pro Se. Silas Bent Taylor, Deputy Attorney General, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

S.D.W.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Advertisement
view counter
1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his habeas petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Marks v. Duncil, No. CA-95-304-3 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED